How does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management? a case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya

dc.contributor.authorTsofa, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorMolyneux, Sassy
dc.contributor.authorGilson, Lucy
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Catherine
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-18T07:12:33Z
dc.date.available2017-09-18T07:12:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-15
dc.date.updated2017-09-17T03:19:46Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: A common challenge for health sector planning and budgeting has been the misalignment between policies, technical planning and budgetary allocation; and inadequate community involvement in priority setting. Health system decentralisation has often been promoted to address health sector planning and budgeting challenges through promoting community participation, accountability, and technical efficiency in resource management. In 2010, Kenya passed a new constitution that introduced 47 semi-autonomous devolved county governments, and a substantial transfer of responsibility for healthcare from the central government to these counties. Methods: This study analysed the effects of this major political decentralization on health sector planning, budgeting and overall financial management at county level. We used a qualitative, case study design focusing on Kilifi County, and were guided by a conceptual framework which drew on decentralisation and policy analysis theories. Qualitative data were collected through document reviews, key informant interviews, and participant and non-participant observations conducted over an eighteen months’ period. Results: We found that the implementation of devolution created an opportunity for local level prioritisation and community involvement in health sector planning and budgeting hence increasing opportunities for equity in local level resource allocation. However, this opportunity was not harnessed due to accelerated transfer of functions to counties before county level capacity had been established to undertake the decentralised functions. We also observed some indication of re-centralisation of financial management from health facility to county level. Conclusion: We conclude by arguing that, to enhance the benefits of decentralised health systems, resource allocation, priority setting and financial management functions between central and decentralised units are guided by considerations around decision space, organisational structure and capacity, and accountability. In acknowledging the political nature of decentralisation polices, we recommend that health sector policy actors develop a broad understanding of the countries’ political context when designing and implementing technical strategies for health sector decentralisation.
dc.identifier.apacitationTsofa, B., Molyneux, S., Gilson, L., & Goodman, C. (2017). How does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management? a case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya. <i>International Journal for Equity in Health</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25223en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationTsofa, Benjamin, Sassy Molyneux, Lucy Gilson, and Catherine Goodman "How does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management? a case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya." <i>International Journal for Equity in Health</i> (2017) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25223en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationTsofa, B., Molyneux, S., Gilson, L., & Goodman, C. (2017). How does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management? A case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(1):151. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-017-0649-0.
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Tsofa, Benjamin AU - Molyneux, Sassy AU - Gilson, Lucy AU - Goodman, Catherine AB - Background: A common challenge for health sector planning and budgeting has been the misalignment between policies, technical planning and budgetary allocation; and inadequate community involvement in priority setting. Health system decentralisation has often been promoted to address health sector planning and budgeting challenges through promoting community participation, accountability, and technical efficiency in resource management. In 2010, Kenya passed a new constitution that introduced 47 semi-autonomous devolved county governments, and a substantial transfer of responsibility for healthcare from the central government to these counties. Methods: This study analysed the effects of this major political decentralization on health sector planning, budgeting and overall financial management at county level. We used a qualitative, case study design focusing on Kilifi County, and were guided by a conceptual framework which drew on decentralisation and policy analysis theories. Qualitative data were collected through document reviews, key informant interviews, and participant and non-participant observations conducted over an eighteen months’ period. Results: We found that the implementation of devolution created an opportunity for local level prioritisation and community involvement in health sector planning and budgeting hence increasing opportunities for equity in local level resource allocation. However, this opportunity was not harnessed due to accelerated transfer of functions to counties before county level capacity had been established to undertake the decentralised functions. We also observed some indication of re-centralisation of financial management from health facility to county level. Conclusion: We conclude by arguing that, to enhance the benefits of decentralised health systems, resource allocation, priority setting and financial management functions between central and decentralised units are guided by considerations around decision space, organisational structure and capacity, and accountability. In acknowledging the political nature of decentralisation polices, we recommend that health sector policy actors develop a broad understanding of the countries’ political context when designing and implementing technical strategies for health sector decentralisation. DA - 2017-09-15 DB - OpenUCT DO - 10.1186/s12939-017-0649-0 DP - University of Cape Town J1 - International Journal for Equity in Health LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2017 T1 - How does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management? a case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya TI - How does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management? a case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25223 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-017-0649-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/25223
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationTsofa B, Molyneux S, Gilson L, Goodman C. How does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management? a case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2017; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/25223.en_ZA
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Public Health and Family Medicineen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Health Sciencesen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceInternational Journal for Equity in Health
dc.source.urihttps://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/
dc.subject.otherDecentralization
dc.subject.otherDevolution
dc.subject.otherPlanning and budgeting
dc.subject.otherFinancial management
dc.subject.otherKenya
dc.titleHow does decentralisation affect health sector planning and financial management? a case study of early effects of devolution in Kilifi County, Kenya
dc.typeJournal Article
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Tsofa_Article_2017.pdf
Size:
554.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections