Engaged Citizenship and the enabling state as factors determining the interference parameter of property: A comparison of German and South African Law

dc.contributor.authorMostert, Hanri
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-13T11:34:22Z
dc.date.available2018-02-13T11:34:22Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-01-15T10:05:21Z
dc.description.abstractSince its conception, the idea of constitutional property protection and regulation in South Africa has been an academically captivating issue.1 At first, politicians negotiated whether the Constitution should protect vested private property interests and contribute to the goals of political reform, and how such a compromise could be achieved.2 Simultaneously, academics flexed their comparativist muscles, contemplating which of the prominent models of constitutional property protection encountered worldwide would lend itself best to adaptation for South Africa.
dc.identifier.apacitationMostert, H. (2010). Engaged Citizenship and the enabling state as factors determining the interference parameter of property: A comparison of German and South African Law. <i>South African Law Journal</i>, http://hdl.handle.net/11427/27560en_ZA
dc.identifier.chicagocitationMostert, Hanri "Engaged Citizenship and the enabling state as factors determining the interference parameter of property: A comparison of German and South African Law." <i>South African Law Journal</i> (2010) http://hdl.handle.net/11427/27560en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMostert, H. (2010). Engaged citizenship and the enabling state as factors determining the interference parameter of property: a comparison of German and South African law. South African Law Journal, 127(2), 238-273.
dc.identifier.ris TY - Journal Article AU - Mostert, Hanri AB - Since its conception, the idea of constitutional property protection and regulation in South Africa has been an academically captivating issue.1 At first, politicians negotiated whether the Constitution should protect vested private property interests and contribute to the goals of political reform, and how such a compromise could be achieved.2 Simultaneously, academics flexed their comparativist muscles, contemplating which of the prominent models of constitutional property protection encountered worldwide would lend itself best to adaptation for South Africa. DA - 2010 DB - OpenUCT DP - University of Cape Town J1 - South African Law Journal LK - https://open.uct.ac.za PB - University of Cape Town PY - 2010 T1 - Engaged Citizenship and the enabling state as factors determining the interference parameter of property: A comparison of German and South African Law TI - Engaged Citizenship and the enabling state as factors determining the interference parameter of property: A comparison of German and South African Law UR - http://hdl.handle.net/11427/27560 ER - en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11427/27560
dc.identifier.vancouvercitationMostert H. Engaged Citizenship and the enabling state as factors determining the interference parameter of property: A comparison of German and South African Law. South African Law Journal. 2010; http://hdl.handle.net/11427/27560.en_ZA
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.departmentDepartment of Private Lawen_ZA
dc.publisher.facultyFaculty of Lawen_ZA
dc.publisher.institutionUniversity of Cape Town
dc.sourceSouth African Law Journal
dc.source.urihttps://juta.co.za/law/products/3601-south-african-law-journal/
dc.titleEngaged Citizenship and the enabling state as factors determining the interference parameter of property: A comparison of German and South African Law
dc.typeJournal Article
uct.type.filetypeText
uct.type.filetypeImage
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mostert_Article_2010.pdf
Size:
145.38 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections